Newsflash:

YouTuber Adil Raja Ordered to Pay £50,000 in Damages from the London High Court

UK High Court orders YouTuber Adil Raja to pay £50k to Brigadier Rashid Naseer for libel, as the court deemed the allegations baseless.

2 min read

YouTuber Adil Raja Ordered to Pay £50,000 in Damages from the London High Court

Major (retd) Adil Raja admits defamatory claims against Brigadier Naseer. [IC: X/@soldierspeaks]

December 11, 2025

London – The London High Court has ordered a prominent UK-based Pakistani social media commentator and YouTuber, Major (retd) Adil Raja, to pay £50,000 in damages to retired Brigadier Rashid Naseer.

The judgment, issued by Justice Richard Spearman KC on October 9, 2025, concluded that a series of allegations made by Mr. Raja between June 14 and June 29, 2022, were defamatory and entirely without foundation.

The High Court ruled decisively in favour of Brigadier Naseer, stating that Mr. Raja offered “no defence” to the claim of libel. The court also ordered Mr. Raja to cover Brigadier Naseer’s high legal costs, in addition to the damages.

The Court’s Finding

The case centred on allegations of corruption and political interference that were widely disseminated across various social media platforms. Brigadier Naseer sought justice to clear his name, arguing that the claims had severely damaged his reputation.

In his ruling, Justice Richard Spearman KC stated:

“At common law, a cause of action for libel is made out by proof that the defendant was responsible for the publication to one or more third parties of a written statement that bore a defamatory meaning about the claimant. Statute has added a requirement that publication caused serious harm to the claimant’s reputation or is likely to do so: Defamation Act 2013, s 1(1). If this much is established, the burden shifts to the defendant to raise a defence. So defamation remains a relatively simple tort to prove …”

These ruling underscores the UK judiciary’s commitment to holding individuals accountable for publishing serious and baseless claims, regardless of where the commentator is based.

Reactions Across Social Media

The verdict immediately triggered a flurry of reaction online, particularly among followers of Pakistan’s political landscape, where the commentator had a large following.

Adil Raja’s Response

Following the October ruling, Adil Raja used his own social media platform, X, to share the judgment of the court.

Netizen Divided

The political nature of the original allegations meant that the ruling was interpreted sharply differently across the internet.

Many supporters celebrated the fact that Adil Raja didn’t apologize to Brigadier Naseer, claiming it a victory of his narrative.

Conversely, those supporting the institutions seen as targeted by Mr. Raja celebrated the verdict as a victory for truth and integrity. They wanted Adil Raja to issue an apology to Brigadier Naseer.

Related Articles

Afghan officials cite Sharia for human rights protection, but regional and UN focus remains on verifiable implementation of counter-terror and security guarantees.
Pakistan issues a formal diplomatic protest (demarche) to Norway after its Ambassador attended an activist’s Supreme Court hearing.
Pakistan demands written terror assurances from the Afghan regime, noting the ceasefire has deteriorated and criticizing the refusal of humanitarian aid.
Pakistan and Indonesia elevate ties with 8 MoUs, and Pakistan demands a written Taliban assurance on terror; slams Israel on Rafah.

Post a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *