In April 2026, Pakistan’s State Bank balance sheet recorded 2 transactions that no single analyst has placed side by side with the weight they deserve. The United Arab Emirates recalled its $3.45 billion deposit after 7 years of automatic rollovers, completing the final $1 billion repayment on April 23. In the same fortnight, Saudi Arabia transferred $3 billion in fresh deposits and extended its existing $5 billion facility to 2028, formalising both arrangements on the sidelines of the IMF-World Bank Spring Meetings in Washington. One Gulf relationship contracted. The other deepened in ways that go far beyond balance-of-payments support.
The Scale of What Saudi Arabia Holds
Saudi Arabia contributed $9.34 billion in remittances to Pakistan during FY2025, leading all countries by a wide margin, followed by the UAE at $7.83 billion. Pakistan has now made eight formal requests to Riyadh under long-term economic cooperation, including converting $5 billion in short-term deposits into a 10-year facility, expanding the deferred oil payment arrangement from $1.2 billion to $5 billion, and securing the securitisation of approximately $10 billion in remittances. The existing $5 billion deposit carries a 4% annual interest rate and has been central to stabilising Pakistan’s external account across successive IMF programmes.
Add it together, Saudi deposits now account for roughly half of Pakistan’s foreign exchange reserves. Saudi remittances, exports, and the oil facility together approach $9 billion annually, against a current account surplus that the SBP described as the highest in 22 years after remittances powered Pakistan’s first current account surplus in 14 years. If those Saudi inflows were removed, Pakistan’s surplus would flip into an immediate deficit of approximately $6 billion.
Why UAE Pulled Back
The deposit recall carried no official explanation beyond standard bilateral commercial language. But the timing landed in the middle of a charged regional moment. Analysts and regional influencers began drawing connections between the UAE’s 2020 Abraham Accords commitments and its visible unease in neutrality. The argument circulating in think-tank and commentary circles was straightforward: normalisation had locked certain relationships into a binary logic, and neutrality read as misalignment.
The UAE had previously assured the IMF of maintaining its financial exposure to Pakistan until 2027. That assurance did not hold. No official explanation addressed the gap. The commentary filled it instead, and the sequencing of the recall against the backdrop of Pakistan’s active diplomatic role gave that commentary more traction than any government statement could have.
What Riyadh’s Response Means
By acting before reserve stress escalated into a balance-of-payments crisis, Saudi Arabia also strengthened Pakistan’s negotiating leverage with the IMF, China, and other bilateral creditors during the coming months of financial negotiations. The Saudi deposit arrived only months after both countries formalised a Strategic Mutual Defence Agreement, reinforcing the perception that Riyadh increasingly views Pakistan’s economic stability as an essential component of wider Gulf security, regional deterrence, and long-term strategic competition across South Asia and the Arabian Peninsula. Riyadh endorsed Islamabad’s neutrality with a financial instrument.
The Instrument That Changed
For 3 decades, Gulf sovereign deposits on emerging-market balance sheets were patient capital, rolled over annually and indifferent to foreign policy. April 2026 changed that. Two Gulf sovereigns used the same instrument, in the same week, on the same balance sheet, to register opposite political judgments on Pakistan’s conduct during the Iran conflict. Abu Dhabi adopted a more commercial and transactional posture while Riyadh presented itself as Pakistan’s long-term guarantor, reflecting divergent strategic calculations regarding regional positioning within South Asia.
Pakistan honored every repayment on time, absorbed a $5 billion external debt month in April alone, and maintained its reserves. The country was paid twice: once for what it delivered, and once for what it chose not to surrender. The accounting is settled. The precedent is not.
Read more: Turkish Delegation Visits Islamabad’s Health Services Academy to Boost Healthcare Cooperation
