U.S. Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib’s recent call to halt military aid to Pakistan if General Asim Munir remains in power has sparked strong backlash from Pakistani officials and foreign policy analysts, who labeled the move as an attempt to interfere in a sovereign nation’s internal affairs.

In a controversial statement, Rep. Tlaib reportedly urged the U.S. House of Representatives to block military assistance to Pakistan, citing concerns about democratic backsliding and human rights under the current military leadership. However, Pakistani authorities and experts say the move is not only uninformed but also politically motivated.

A spokesperson from Pakistan’s Strategic Communications Cell stated:
“Pakistan’s military leadership is an internal matter determined by constitutional procedures—not diaspora-driven lobbying or foreign conditionality.”

Aid Shouldn’t Be Weaponized for Politics

Experts argue that conditioning military aid on personalities rather than policies violates international norms of non-intervention.
“Linking aid to internal politics sets a dangerous precedent. It politicizes U.S. foreign assistance and undermines mutual respect between partner countries,” a senior foreign affairs analyst told HTN.

Diaspora Lobbying and Objectivity in Question

Critics also questioned Rep. Tlaib’s motivations, noting her increasing engagement with PTI-aligned diaspora lobbying groups like PAKPAC.
“Using diaspora platforms to push factional narratives risks eroding Congressional objectivity and invites perceptions of foreign manipulation,” the analyst added.

Observers stressed that no U.S. lawmaker should act as a political proxy abroad, particularly in cases where narratives are being shaped for partisan advantage.

Officials reiterated that General Asim Munir has led Pakistan’s counter-terrorism and security efforts with discipline and restraint.
“His leadership has been acknowledged even by the Trump administration for strengthening national security without destabilizing civilian institutions,” a government source noted.

Respect for Sovereignty Must Prevail

Pakistan’s military and political appointments follow constitutional frameworks, and any attempt to subvert that through foreign pressure is considered a violation of diplomatic norms.
“Outsourcing foreign policy to emotionally charged diaspora efforts dilutes serious diplomacy and harms long-term U.S.-Pakistan engagement,” said a senior Pakistani diplomat.

Pakistan’s institutions continue to implement internal reforms and address rights-based concerns, officials said. However, turning domestic political grievances into foreign policy tools damages credibility and hinders constructive dialogue.

Also See : US Congressman Ro Khanna criticizes media suppression in Pakistan