Newsflash:

PSC President Questions German Ambassador on Double Standards of Freedom of Expression

PSC President Ali Abdullah criticizes double standards in freedom of expression at international forums.

[read-estimate]

PSC President Highlights Double Standards in Freedom of Expression

Ali Abdullah questions German Ambassador over selective application of freedom of expression [IC: by AFP]

February 10, 2026

At the Asma Jahangir Conference, Ali Abdullah, President of the Progressive Students’ Collective (PSC), questioned the German Ambassador over her statements on disability issues, pointing out that her government simultaneously funds programs that harm children in Gaza.

Ali Abdullah highlighted that freedom of expression appears to be respected only when criticism is directed at the Government of Pakistan or state institutions. When questions are raised about other governments or authorities, he noted, some Western-leaning liberal groups react quickly to stifle and silence the speaker. He described this as a clear example of double standards in human rights and freedom of expression.

He further urged participants to collect clips and footage from other conferences to expose these contradictions and biases, showing that freedom of expression is not applied equally for everyone.

This response by the PSC President reflects broader concerns about the selective enforcement of freedom of expression internationally and illustrates how some institutions and governments permit criticism of certain states while limiting scrutiny of others.

Related Articles

In a recent video of Shahbaz Gill, he is being accused of promoting the Indian narrative by falsely citing a British newspaper for the sake of dollars and views.
A special rap track going viral on social media has exposed Fitna al-Kharij leader Noor Wali Mehsud and his RAW-funded terror network.
The anti-Pakistan narrative of the Indian representative at the UN has exposed the New Delhi-Kabul Nexus where terrorism originating from Afghan soil is being ignored.
Dawn, BBC, CNN and Al Jazeera covered the same Iran-US conflict and produced entirely different realities. A critical look at how headline language, verb choices and editorial silences reveal whose violence gets named and whose gets naturalized in international conflict journalism.

Post a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *