Al Mirsad Alleges Pakistan–ISIS-K Links; UN Findings Contradict Claim

Kabul/Islamabad — An allegedly Afghan Taliban intelligence-backed digital media platform Al Mirsad recently claimed the existence of a “shadowy triangular alliance” connecting Pakistan, ISIS-K (ISKP), and Zionist actors in a coordinated effort against Islam. The platform tweeted an article on November 23, stating, “This covert front did not end with Pakistan and ISIS. Together, they forged a shadowy triangular alliance linking ISIS, Pakistan, and Zionism.”

The surge in Al Mirsad’s anti-Pakistan messaging comes after Pakistan and Afghanistan failed to reach an agreement on a workable security framework, reportedly due to the Afghan Taliban regime’s reluctance for a formal written arrangement. Analysts say Al Mirsad’s claims distort the reality of regional security. UN assessments and European Union reports confirm that ISKP operates primarily from Afghan territory, while Pakistan has consistently conducted counter-terrorism operations targeting both ISKP and TTP militants threatening its borders. Far from being part of any alliance, Pakistan has repeatedly coordinated with international partners to counter extremist threats emanating from Afghanistan.

Security experts highlight that Al Mirsad’s narrative ignores documented evidence. “ISKP and other terrorist groups continue to operate within Afghanistan, posing direct threats to Pakistan and the wider region,” said one analyst. “Al Mirsad’s attempt to shift blame onto Pakistan is a propaganda tactic, not an assessment grounded in fact.”

International recognition further reinforces this counter-narrative. Statements from the UN, EU, the US, and Russia emphasize Pakistan’s sustained counter-terror operations and warn that Afghan-based ISKP sanctuaries could be used to plan attacks beyond the country’s borders. These findings contradict Al Mirsad’s assertion of any Pakistani involvement in terrorist networks.

Analysts stress that propaganda like Al Mirsad’s can mislead public perception but does not reflect verified intelligence. “Stability in the region depends on factual reporting and genuine cooperation,” noted a regional security expert. “Narratives engineered to deflect responsibility from ISKP and TTP’s real operations only undermine regional security efforts.”

While Al Mirsad positions itself as an authority, it lacks recognized expertise on Pakistan’s defense or counter-terror strategies. Observers note that the platform’s messaging aligns closely with extremist rhetoric, raising questions about its intentions rather than Pakistan’s policies.