Newsflash:

Board of Peace: Who Joined, Who Refused and What It Aims to Do

Explainer on the new Board of Peace launched at Davos: who joined, who refused, who leads it, and what the initiative claims it aims to achieve.

3 min read

Trump Board of Peace

Here is a complete explainer on the Board of Peace launched at Davos, its leadership, member states, countries that refused to join, and its stated goals [IC: by AFP]

January 22, 2026

A new international initiative titled the “Board of Peace” was formally launched at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, with the signing of its founding charter on January 22, 2026.

The initiative led by US President Donald Trump is presented as a new framework to guide post-war stabilization and peace efforts beginning with Gaza and potentially expanding to other conflicts.

The Davos event marked the first public institutional rollout of the body and functioned primarily as a political and strategic announcement rather than a negotiation forum.

1- Formation and Governance Structure

Key Item’sDetails
NameBoard of Peace
Announced atWorld Economic Forum, Davos
Charter signedJanuary 22, 2026
Top AuthorityFounding Executive Council
ChairDonald Trump
Stated RoleStrategic authority for post-war stabiliZation and peace initiatives, starting with Gaza

2- Founding Executive Council (Full Composition)

No.NamePosition
1Tony BlairFormer British Prime Minister
2Jared KushnerFormer US Senior Adviser
3Marco RubioUS Secretary of State
4Steve WitkoffUS Special Envoy for the Middle East
5Marc RowanCEO, Apollo Global Management
6Ajay BangaPresident, World Bank Group
7Robert GabrielUS Deputy National Security Adviser

3- Countries That Signed the Charter (At Davos)

Country NamesCountry NamesCountry NamesCountry Names
United StatesBahrainMoroccoArgentina
ArmeniaAzerbaijanBulgariaHungary
IndonesiaJordanKazakhstanKosovo
PakistanParaguayQatarSaudi Arabia
TürkiyeUnited Arab EmiratesUzbekistanMongolia

Leaders or representatives of more than 20 countries signed the charter during the ceremony. Donald Trump signed as chairman.

4- Countries That Declined or Opted Out

CountryStatus
United KingdomOpted out
FranceDeclined
NorwayDeclined
SwedenDeclined
SloveniaDeclined

5- Immediate Controversies

IssueDetails
ObjectionsRaised by multiple Arab and Muslim states
Main ConcernInclusion of Tony Blair
ReasonBlair Institute’s reported role in “day-after Gaza” planning
Additional ConcernAlleged links to Israeli business figures and a coastal development proposal sometimes described by critics as a “Trump Riviera” project
Jared Kushner ContextHis 2024 remarks describing Gaza’s waterfront as “valuable” and suggesting population relocation were cited by critics in Davos

6- President Trump’s Key Statements at the Charter Signing

6.1 On the Launch and Global Interest

ThemeStatement
Launch“A very exciting day, long in the making.”
Venue“no better place” than Davos
Participation“Everybody wants to be a part.”

6.2 On the State of the World and His Record

ClaimStatement
Global security“Today the world is a safer, richer and much more peaceful place than it was one year ago.”
Middle East“We have peace in the Middle East — no one thought that was possible.”
WarsClaimed he had “stopped eight wars” and “put out all those fires.”

6.3 On the Purpose, Scope and Authority of the Board

AreaStatement
Initial focusGaza: reconstruction, demilitarisation, post-ceasefire stability
ExpansionSaid the board would expand to other conflicts after Gaza
Authority“Once this board is completely formed, we can do pretty much whatever we want to do.”
Ambition“It has the chance to be one of the most consequential bodies ever created.”
His roleSaid he was “honoured” to chair the board

6.4 On the United Nations

TopicStatement
CooperationSaid the board would work “in conjunction with the United Nations”
RationaleSuggested the UN has untapped potential but referenced past shortcomings
Combined roleSaid the Board plus the UN could be “something very, very unique for the world”

6.5 On Hamas and Gaza

IssueStatement
DisarmamentSaid Hamas must give up its weapons
Warning“If they don’t do that, it is going to be the end of them.”

7- Overall Assessment

Supporters’ ViewCritics’ View
A pragmatic, power-driven mechanism for faster conflict resolutionRisks bypassing or weakening existing multilateral and UN-based frameworks
Focused on execution rather than processGovernance model concentrates excessive authority
Backed by political and financial influenceBlurs lines between geopolitics, reconstruction, and commercial interests

Conclusion

The launch of the Board of Peace at Davos represents a major political and strategic initiative with high-level backing and a defined starting focus on Gaza.

At the same time, the structure, leadership model and underlying assumptions have generated significant diplomatic and political controversy.

The Davos event did not mark the start of negotiations but rather the formal announcement of a new power based framework whose role in global conflict management will now be closely watched.

Related Articles

US warns Americans of detention risks in Taliban-controlled Afghanistan and maintains travel ban amid rising security concerns.
Taliban cleric issues fatwa against Pakistan, raising fears of cross-border militancy and regional instability.
A viral dance video at the WWII Memorial sparks backlash and deportation calls for an Indian-origin tech worker as US authorities review the incident.
Afghanistan vs Sri Lanka cricket series in the UAE postponed due to regional security concerns; new dates expected later in 2026.

Post a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *