Newsflash:

Taliban Seek Participation in SCO Meetings Despite Diplomatic Isolation

Taliban seek SCO meetings attendance despite lack of international recognition and growing regional scrutiny.

[read-estimate]

Taliban ambassador Gul Hassan calls for Afghanistan’s participation in SCO meetings amid diplomatic isolation

Taliban seek attendance in Shanghai Cooperation Organization sessions despite ongoing international scrutiny[IC : by AFP]

February 2, 2026

Moscow — The Taliban have again called for participation in meetings of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), despite Afghanistan’s continued diplomatic isolation under Taliban rule. Gul Hassan, the Taliban-appointed ambassador in Moscow, claimed that Afghanistan holds observer status in the SCO and therefore should be included in the organization’s sessions.

However, Afghanistan’s engagement with regional and international forums has remained limited since the Taliban takeover in 2021, largely due to the group’s lack of international recognition and ongoing concerns over governance, human rights, and security commitments.

While the Taliban argue that Afghanistan remains a key regional stakeholder, analysts note that participation in platforms such as the SCO depends on credibility, compliance with international norms, and regional trust, areas where the Taliban continue to face scrutiny.

The SCO, which includes China, Russia, Pakistan, and Central Asian states, has so far issued no official response to the Taliban’s request.

Related Articles

In a recent video of Shahbaz Gill, he is being accused of promoting the Indian narrative by falsely citing a British newspaper for the sake of dollars and views.
A special rap track going viral on social media has exposed Fitna al-Kharij leader Noor Wali Mehsud and his RAW-funded terror network.
The anti-Pakistan narrative of the Indian representative at the UN has exposed the New Delhi-Kabul Nexus where terrorism originating from Afghan soil is being ignored.
Dawn, BBC, CNN and Al Jazeera covered the same Iran-US conflict and produced entirely different realities. A critical look at how headline language, verb choices and editorial silences reveal whose violence gets named and whose gets naturalized in international conflict journalism.

Post a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *