Kabul — Internal criticism of Taliban governance in Afghanistan is becoming increasingly visible, with concerns raised over representation, inclusivity, and the structure of power.
Former Paktia governor Mohammad Halim Fidai has called for the formation of an inclusive government, arguing that the current system does not adequately reflect the country’s diverse population. He emphasized that governance should represent all Afghans rather than a limited segment.
Concerns Over Representation
Observers note that Afghanistan’s population includes a significant proportion of non-Pashtun communities, yet their participation in decision-making structures remains limited. Critics point to the composition of leadership and key ministries as indicators of imbalance.
Reports suggest that a large share of senior positions is held by members of a specific group, while representation of communities such as Tajiks, Uzbeks, Baloch, and Nuristanis is comparatively small. The absence of representation for some groups, including women, has also been highlighted in discussions.
Centralized Control and Governance Challenges
Analysts say that decision-making remains highly centralized, with leadership structures perceived as distant from broader societal dynamics. This has raised questions about whether the current model can effectively address Afghanistan’s complex social and political realities.
Critics argue that instead of reducing divisions, the present system may deepen existing gaps, potentially affecting long-term stability.
Calls for Broader Inclusion
Voices like Fidai’s reflect a wider debate within Afghanistan about governance and national unity. Some analysts believe that a more inclusive political framework could help address internal challenges and foster greater stability.
The discussion highlights an ongoing question: whether Afghanistan’s current system can evolve into a more representative structure that accommodates the country’s diverse communities.
