Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Suhail Afridi recently spoke to the media on Adiala Road. During his conversation, he claimed that state institutions were not serious about fighting terrorism. However, much of his focus remained on the facilities and meetings related to the PTI founder.
According to Suhail Afridi, institutions are mainly focused on weakening PTI. One of the most discussed parts of his statement was his remark that whatever Aleema Khan decides will be followed. This comment has triggered debate over who is actually influencing political decisions in the province.
Meanwhile, many people are now questioning whether the province’s security issues have become less important than meetings involving a jailed political leader. Critics argue that if terrorism is truly the biggest challenge, then discussions should move beyond political personalities and focus on public safety.
Recently, around two dozen people were affected in a terrorist incident in Bannu. However, instead of announcing a clear security plan or holding a high level emergency meeting, the provincial leadership focused mainly on criticism and blame. As a result, questions are being raised about whether the province’s security policy is being shaped by elected officials or by family influence.
In addition, Suhail Afridi has criticized institutions for lacking seriousness, but opponents say his own government has failed to show strong performance. Critics point out that there has been little visible progress in police reforms or intelligence coordination in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
Furthermore, the province has remained under the influence of the same political thinking for the past thirteen years. Yet many citizens believe the results have not met expectations. Public frustration is growing as people feel that every failure is blamed on others instead of being addressed directly.
At the same time, many residents say they no longer want political drama or constant protests. They are asking for a responsible government that focuses on governance, safety, and practical solutions.
Finally, critics argue that seriousness against terrorism is shown through policy and action, not road visits or political statements. They say the people of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa need peace, security, and accountability more than speeches and social media campaigns.
