Ahmad Massoud Criticizes Taliban Judicial Code as Worse than ISIS and Soviet Actions

Ahmad Massoud calls Taliban judicial code worse than ISIS and Soviet actions warning of human rights and societal impact in Afghanistan.

[read-estimate]

Ahmad Massoud delivers a video message criticizing the Taliban judicial code and highlighting its negative impact on Afghan society.[IC : by AFP]

By News Desk

January 26, 2026

Ahmad Massoud, leader of the National Resistance Front of Afghanistan, sharply criticized the Taliban’s new judicial code in a video message shared on social media, describing it as worse than the actions of ISIS and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.

He stated that the content of the code, which legitimizes violence, discrimination, and the deprivation of human dignity, fails to meet any religious, humanitarian, or legal standards, emphasizing that Taliban policies and laws are pushing Afghanistan toward darkness and regression.

The video, published on 26 January 2026, highlights that the resistance leadership continues to openly oppose Taliban actions and warns of the human rights and societal consequences of these new regulations.

News Desk

Shahbaz Gill Faces Backlash Over Alleged Narrative Distortion in Social Media Video

In a recent video of Shahbaz Gill, he is being accused of promoting the Indian narrative by falsely citing a British newspaper for the sake of dollars and views.

May 22, 2026
India, Pakistan, Politics

Viral Track on Social Media Exposes TTP Chief Noor Wali Mehsud’s Reality

A special rap track going viral on social media has exposed Fitna al-Kharij leader Noor Wali Mehsud and his RAW-funded terror network.

May 22, 2026
Afghanistan, India

Terror Safe Havens in Afghanistan and Kabul-Delhi Nexus Exposed

The anti-Pakistan narrative of the Indian representative at the UN has exposed the New Delhi-Kabul Nexus where terrorism originating from Afghan soil is being ignored.

May 22, 2026
Afghanistan, India

When Headlines Go to War: How Media Framed the Iran-US Conflict

Dawn, BBC, CNN and Al Jazeera covered the same Iran-US conflict and produced entirely different realities. A critical look at how headline language, verb choices and editorial silences reveal whose violence gets named and whose gets naturalized in international conflict journalism.