Newsflash:

Experts Defend Pakistan Strikes After Khalilzad Criticism

Experts back Pakistan airstrikes on Afghan terrorist sites after Khalilzad criticizes civilian casualties claims.

[read-estimate]

Zalmay Khalilzad US Former Envoy Criticizes Pakistan Strikes

Former US envoy Zalmay Khalilzad reacts to Pakistan’s airstrikes on terrorist positions in Afghanistan, sparking regional debate [IC: by AFP]

February 22, 2026

Former US envoy Zalmay Khalilzad recently criticized Pakistan for its airstrikes in Afghanistan. He claimed the strikes caused civilian casualties, including women and children, and called the operations condemnable. Khalilzad urged Pakistan to adopt a more peaceful approach that prioritizes regional stability.

These remarks, however, have sparked debate across the region. Analysts point out that Khalilzad’s own track record raises questions. During his tenure, he helped negotiate the Doha framework, which aimed to facilitate peace in Afghanistan but failed to dismantle terrorist safe havens.

Reports later showed that more than 20 terrorist groups, including over 13,000 foreign fighters, remained active in the country. Critics argue that his calls for restraint overlook the security risks these groups continue to pose.

Pakistan’s Counterterror Efforts and Regional Security

Pakistan’s strikes targeted terrorist groups operating across the border, particularly the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). Cross-border attacks by these groups have caused repeated casualties in Pakistan, highlighting the operational threats emerging from Afghan territory. Officials stress that these measures were not impulsive but followed years of intelligence gathering, warnings, and diplomatic engagement.

Experts say criticism that frames Pakistan’s actions as “intervention” ignores the reality of ongoing threats. The airstrikes were aimed at neutralizing key militant positions, protecting Pakistani citizens, and reinforcing border security.

They argue that selective accountability, which focuses on civilian casualties without acknowledging the permissive environment for terrorists, creates an incomplete picture of regional challenges.

Moving forward, analysts emphasize that lasting peace requires dismantling terrorist infrastructure rather than placing blame alone. Pakistan’s actions demonstrate a commitment to protecting its population while countering groups that exploit Afghan territory.

Observers believe that balancing security with diplomacy is essential, but taking action against armed militants remains a necessary step for regional stability.

Read more: Khalilzad’s Drone Justification Sparks Accusations of Double Standards on Regional Security

Related Articles

Record immigration from India to Canada and the rapidly changing demographics of cities like Toronto have sparked a new debate about the country’s resources and immigration policy.
CM Sohail Afridi is facing severe criticism for ignoring public issues over the Gomal University crisis and the dismissal of PhD teachers in KP.
A viral video from Nepal’s Annapurna Conservation Area shows locals confronting Indian tourists for littering and making them clean up their own waste, reigniting debate over tourist behaviour abroad.
Pakistan’s nuclear weapons architecture spans a complete land, air and sea triad covering every corner of India at three tiers of destructive yield, from the Nasr tactical missile to the Taimoor cruise missile and Hangor-class submarines now entering service.

Post a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *