Newsflash:

Fact-Checking Zabihullah Mujahid on Terror and Regional Instability

Analysts fact-check Zabihullah Mujahid’s claims on Afghanistan, cross-border terrorism, and regional instability.

2 min read

Zabihullah Mujahid Interview Tolo News

Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid speaks to Tolo News, addressing sanctions, cross-border attacks, and Pakistan’s security concerns [IC : by AFP]

February 14, 2026

Kabul / Islamabad – In a recent interview with Tolo News on 13 February, Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid made several claims regarding Afghanistan’s security situation, sanctions, and regional stability. He dismissed Pakistan’s concerns, rejected warnings from Russia about terrorism, and argued that cross-border tensions were unrelated to Afghanistan. Analysts and international monitoring reports, however, present a very different picture.

Sanctions Are Tied to Active Threats

Contrary to Mujahid’s claims, United Nations monitoring and global financial authorities maintain that sanctions on the Taliban regime are not remnants of war. They remain linked to active terrorist networks operating under Taliban oversight. Frozen assets reflect serious international concerns about the diversion of funds to sanctioned groups, including Al-Qaeda and the Tehrik‑e‑Taliban Pakistan (TTP).

Documented Regional Threats

Evidence from UN reports shows more than 20 terrorist organizations and over 13,000 foreign fighters remain active in Afghanistan. Cross-border attacks into Pakistan and Central Asia, including Tajikistan, highlight the tangible threat emanating from Afghan territory. Security measures such as Pakistan’s border closures and precision strikes on terror hideouts were responses to verified attacks and growing extremist infrastructure—not political posturing.

Discrepancy Between Claims and Reality

Mujahid’s assertions of nationwide stability and harmless regional impact are contradicted by over 600 documented cross-border TTP attacks on Pakistan. The 37th UN Monitoring Team report confirms that TTP operates from Afghan soil with unprecedented freedom, while Taliban assurances of controlling terrorism remain unverified. Similarly, CSTO and regional reinforcements along borders reflect genuine security concerns that cannot be dismissed as misinformation.

Need for Measurable Compliance

Experts emphasize that engagement with the Taliban requires concrete compliance on multiple fronts: dismantling terrorist networks, financial transparency, inclusive governance, and respect for human rights. Removing sanctions or easing international pressure without verifiable progress would legitimize entrenched extremist networks, endangering citizens both in Afghanistan and neighboring countries.

Upholding Accountability and Regional Stability

The interview underscores the importance of separating propaganda from verifiable facts. While the Taliban portrays itself as a stabilizing authority, on-the-ground realities—documented cross-border attacks, foreign fighter presence, and extremist patronage—tell a story of ongoing insecurity. Analysts stress that Pakistan’s defensive measures and international sanctions are rooted in documented threats, aimed at safeguarding citizens and promoting regional stability.

Read more :Afghanistan Declared High-Risk and Unsafe as Security, Terrorism, and Human Rights Concerns Deepen

Related Articles

Taliban, led by Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, offers 1–10 year residency to foreign investors despite security and governance risks.
Hamas spokesperson Dr Khaled Qaddoumi praises Pakistan’s principled stance on Palestine and calls for ceasefire in Gaza.
Four Pharmacy students expelled from Bacha Khan University for violating regulations and raising anti-state slogans
Indian national Nikhil Gupta pleads guilty in New York to plotting against US Sikh leader Gurpatwant Singh Pannun

Post a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *